↓ Skip to main content

Dendritic function in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Neurosciences, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
434 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dendritic function in vivo
Published in
Trends in Neurosciences, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.tins.2014.11.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Dendrites are the predominant entry site for excitatory synaptic potentials in most types of central neurons. There is increasing evidence that dendrites are not just passive transmitting devices but play active roles in synaptic integration through linear and non-linear mechanisms. Frequently, excitatory synapses are formed on dendritic spines. In addition to relaying incoming electrical signals, spines can play important roles in modifying these signals through complex biochemical processes and, thereby, determine learning and memory formation. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of the function of spines and dendrites in central mammalian neurons in vivo by focusing particularly on insights obtained from Ca(2+) imaging studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 434 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
Germany 5 1%
Japan 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 402 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 118 27%
Researcher 98 23%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Master 33 8%
Professor 24 6%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 58 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 147 34%
Neuroscience 124 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Psychology 14 3%
Other 37 9%
Unknown 75 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2016.
All research outputs
#19,611,376
of 30,096,795 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Neurosciences
#2,343
of 2,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,076
of 385,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Neurosciences
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,096,795 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.