↓ Skip to main content

Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative DNA Sequence Analysis of Wheat and Rice Genomes
Published in
Genome Research, August 2003
DOI 10.1101/gr.1113003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The use of DNA sequence-based comparative genomics for evolutionary studies and for transferring information from model species to crop species has revolutionized molecular genetics and crop improvement strategies. This study compared 4485 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) that were physically mapped in wheat chromosome bins, to the public rice genome sequence data from 2251 ordered BAC/PAC clones using BLAST. A rice genome view of homologous wheat genome locations based on comparative sequence analysis revealed numerous chromosomal rearrangements that will significantly complicate the use of rice as a model for cross-species transfer of information in nonconserved regions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 4 2%
Australia 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 209 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 18%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Professor 13 6%
Other 45 20%
Unknown 33 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 159 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Computer Science 3 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Chemical Engineering 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 39 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2026.
All research outputs
#7,310,906
of 33,732,945 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#2,820
of 5,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,242
of 74,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,732,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.