↓ Skip to main content

Establishing key components of yoga interventions for musculoskeletal conditions: a Delphi survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Establishing key components of yoga interventions for musculoskeletal conditions: a Delphi survey
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-14-196
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence suggests yoga is a safe and effective intervention for the management of physical and psychosocial symptoms associated with musculoskeletal conditions. However, heterogeneity in the components and reporting of clinical yoga trials impedes both the generalization of study results and the replication of study protocols. The aim of this Delphi survey was to address these issues of heterogeneity, by developing a list of recommendations of key components for the design and reporting of yoga interventions for musculoskeletal conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 35 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#27,724,172
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,977
of 4,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,425
of 275,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#70
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.