↓ Skip to main content

Nitro-fatty acid inhibition of triple-negative breast cancer cell viability, migration, invasion, and tumor growth

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Chemistry, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nitro-fatty acid inhibition of triple-negative breast cancer cell viability, migration, invasion, and tumor growth
Published in
Journal of Biological Chemistry, November 2017
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m117.814368
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises ~20% of all breast cancers and is the most aggressive mammary cancer subtype. Devoid of the estrogen and progesterone receptors, along with the receptor tyrosine kinase ERB2 (HER2) that define most mammary cancers, there are no targeted therapies for patients with TNBC. This, combined with a high metastatic rate and a lower 5-year survival rate than for other breast cancer phenotypes, means there is significant unmet need for new therapeutic strategies. Herein, the anti-neoplastic effects of the electrophilic fatty acid nitroalkene derivative, 10-nitro-octadec-9-enoic acid (nitro-oleic acid, NO2-OA), were investigated in multiple preclinical models of TNBC. NO2-OA reduced TNBC cell growth and viability in vitro, attenuated tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα)-induced TNBC cell migration and invasion and inhibited the tumor growth of MDA-MB-231 TNBC cell xenografts in the mammary fat pads of female nude mice. The upregulation of these aggressive tumor cell growth, migration and invasion phenotypes is mediated in part by the constitutive activation of pro-inflammatory nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling in TNBC. NO2-OA inhibited TNFα-induced NF-κB transcriptional activity in human TNBC cells and suppressed downstream NF-κB target gene expression, including the metastasis-related proteins intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and urokinase-type plasminogen activator. The mechanisms accounting for NF-κB signaling inhibition by NO2-OA in TNBC cells were multifaceted, as NO2-OA a) inhibited the inhibitor of NF-κB subunit kinase β phosphorylation and downstream inhibitor of NF-κB degradation, b) alkylated the NF-κB RelA protein to prevent DNA binding and c) promoted RelA polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Comparisons with nontumorigenic human breast epithelial MCF-10A and MCF7 cells revealed that NO2-OA more selectively inhibited TNBC function. This was attributed to more facile mechanisms for maintaining redox homeostasis in normal breast epithelium, including a more favorable thiol/disulfide balance, greater extents of multi-drug resistance protein-1 (1) expression and greater MRP1-mediated efflux of NO2-OA-glutathione conjugates. These observations reveal that electrophilic fatty acid nitroalkenes react with more alkylation sensitive targets in TNBC cells to inhibit growth and viability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 27 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Chemistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 32 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2025.
All research outputs
#2,625,062
of 31,634,113 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#1,610
of 28,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,662
of 472,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Chemistry
#30
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,634,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.