↓ Skip to main content

Reality or Illusion? The Efficacy of Non‐market Strategy in Institutional Risk Reduction

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Management, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reality or Illusion? The Efficacy of Non‐market Strategy in Institutional Risk Reduction
Published in
British Journal of Management, November 2017
DOI 10.1111/1467-8551.12229
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Master 19 14%
Professor 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Lecturer 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 40 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 62 46%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 11%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Engineering 3 2%
Energy 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
#14,179,597
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Management
#451
of 888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,929
of 332,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Management
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.