↓ Skip to main content

TRPV4 and KCa ion channels functionally couple as osmosensors in the paraventricular nucleus

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Pharmacology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TRPV4 and KCa ion channels functionally couple as osmosensors in the paraventricular nucleus
Published in
British Journal of Pharmacology, January 2015
DOI 10.1111/bph.13023
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transient receptor potential vanilloid type 4 (TRPV4) and calcium-activated potassium channels (KCa ) mediate osmosensing in many tissues. Both TRPV4 and KCa channels are found in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, an area critical for sympathetic control of cardiovascular and renal function. Here, we have investigated whether TRPV4 channels functionally couple to KCa channels to mediate osmosensing in PVN parvocellular neurones and have characterized, pharmacologically, the subtype of KCa channel involved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 38 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 10%
Professor 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,929,870
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Pharmacology
#2,127
of 7,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,691
of 360,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Pharmacology
#21
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.