↓ Skip to main content

Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
129 X users
patent
2 patents
weibo
2 weibo users
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
4 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
1056 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Highly evolvable malaria vectors: The genomes of 16 Anopheles mosquitoes
Published in
Science, November 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1258522
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel E Neafsey, Robert M Waterhouse, Mohammad R Abai, Sergey S Aganezov, Max A Alekseyev, James E Allen, James Amon, Bruno Arcà, Peter Arensburger, Gleb Artemov, Lauren A Assour, Hamidreza Basseri, Aaron Berlin, Bruce W Birren, Stephanie A Blandin, Andrew I Brockman, Thomas R Burkot, Austin Burt, Clara S Chan, Cedric Chauve, Joanna C Chiu, Mikkel Christensen, Carlo Costantini, Victoria L M Davidson, Elena Deligianni, Tania Dottorini, Vicky Dritsou, Stacey B Gabriel, Wamdaogo M Guelbeogo, Andrew B Hall, Mira V Han, Thaung Hlaing, Daniel S T Hughes, Adam M Jenkins, Xiaofang Jiang, Irwin Jungreis, Evdoxia G Kakani, Maryam Kamali, Petri Kemppainen, Ryan C Kennedy, Ioannis K Kirmitzoglou, Lizette L Koekemoer, Njoroge Laban, Nicholas Langridge, Mara K N Lawniczak, Manolis Lirakis, Neil F Lobo, Ernesto Lowy, Robert M MacCallum, Chunhong Mao, Gareth Maslen, Charles Mbogo, Jenny McCarthy, Kristin Michel, Sara N Mitchell, Wendy Moore, Katherine A Murphy, Anastasia N Naumenko, Tony Nolan, Eva M Novoa, Samantha O'Loughlin, Chioma Oringanje, Mohammad A Oshaghi, Nazzy Pakpour, Philippos A Papathanos, Ashley N Peery, Michael Povelones, Anil Prakash, David P Price, Ashok Rajaraman, Lisa J Reimer, David C Rinker, Antonis Rokas, Tanya L Russell, N'Fale Sagnon, Maria V Sharakhova, Terrance Shea, Felipe A Simão, Frederic Simard, Michel A Slotman, Pradya Somboon, Vladimir Stegniy, Claudio J Struchiner, Gregg W C Thomas, Marta Tojo, Pantelis Topalis, José M C Tubio, Maria F Unger, John Vontas, Catherine Walton, Craig S Wilding, Judith H Willis, Yi-Chieh Wu, Guiyun Yan, Evgeny M Zdobnov, Xiaofan Zhou, Flaminia Catteruccia, George K Christophides, Frank H Collins, Robert S Cornman, Andrea Crisanti, Martin J Donnelly, Scott J Emrich, Michael C Fontaine, William Gelbart, Matthew W Hahn, Immo A Hansen, Paul I Howell, Fotis C Kafatos, Manolis Kellis, Daniel Lawson, Christos Louis, Shirley Luckhart, Marc A T Muskavitch, José M Ribeiro, Michael A Riehle, Igor V Sharakhov, Zhijian Tu, Laurence J Zwiebel, Nora J Besansky

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,056 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 19 2%
Brazil 7 <1%
Colombia 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 13 1%
Unknown 1001 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 225 21%
Researcher 213 20%
Student > Master 126 12%
Student > Bachelor 81 8%
Other 47 4%
Other 178 17%
Unknown 186 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 459 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 206 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 25 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 2%
Environmental Science 23 2%
Other 101 10%
Unknown 217 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 297. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2026.
All research outputs
#149,375
of 34,837,489 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,370
of 94,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,251
of 428,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#42
of 816 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,837,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,510 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 816 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.