↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Surgical management of extensive hypertrophic scarring of the halluces secondary to a decade of untreated onychocryptosis: An illustrative case report
Published in
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports, November 2017
DOI 10.1177/2050313x17740514
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Extensive hypertrophic scarring of the halluces secondary to chronic onychocryptosis is a rare condition, which causes significant physical and psychosocial effects. In this case, a 31-year-old male developed large lesions on both great toes after he delayed treatment of chronic hallucal onychocryptosis for over a decade. Current treatment options for hypertrophic and keloid lesions in the foot and ankle vary considerably and differentiation is critical for appropriate treatment planning. In this case, surgical excision with total matrixectomy (modified Zadik-Syme) was considered optimal management. Histopathology testing confirmed the diagnosis of irritated hypertrophic scar secondary to onychocryptosis. The patient was monitored closely and at 3 months post-operatively, the incisional scars exhibited progressive maturation, and there was no recurrence of the lesions and no nail regrowth. Furthermore, the halluces were only marginally shorter providing good function and cosmesis. At the long-term follow-up consultation (5.5 years), the patient indicated complete satisfaction and had returned to regular footwear and social activities. Chronic onychocryptosis can trigger and facilitate proliferation of large benign keloid-like fibrous lesions; excision with total matrixectomy can provide an excellent long-term outcome.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2026.
All research outputs
#6,775,475
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
#100
of 682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,350
of 376,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.