↓ Skip to main content

scHiCNorm: a software package to eliminate systematic biases in single-cell Hi-C data

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
scHiCNorm: a software package to eliminate systematic biases in single-cell Hi-C data
Published in
Bioinformatics, November 2017
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx747
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We build a software package scHiCNorm that uses zero-inflated and hurdle models to remove biases from single-cell Hi-C data. Our evaluations prove that our models can effectively eliminate systematic biases for single-cell Hi-C data, which better reveal cell-to-cell variances in terms of chromosomal structures. scHiCNorm is available at http://dna.cs.miami.edu/scHiCNorm/. Perl scripts are provided that can generate bias features. Pre-built bias features for human (hg19 and hg39) and mouse (mm9 and mm10) are available to download. R scripts can be downloaded to remove biases. [email protected]. Supplementary Data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Researcher 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,081,725
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#806
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,368
of 438,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#92
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.