↓ Skip to main content

Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mapping scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) to preference-based utility values
Published in
Quality of Life Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11136-013-0494-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Quality of life mapping methods such as "Transfer to Utility" can be used to translate scores on disease-specific measures to utility values, when traditional utility measurement methods (e.g. standard gamble, time trade-off, preference-based multi-attribute instruments) have not been used. The aim of this study was to generate preliminary ordinary least squares (OLS) regression-based algorithms to transform scores from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ), a widely used measure of mental health in children and adolescents, to utility values obtained using the preference-based Child Health Utility (CHU9D) instrument.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 88 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 15%
Social Sciences 12 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 28 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#17,733,724
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#1,888
of 2,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,591
of 197,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#24
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.