↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions of distress and positive consequences following exposure to a major disaster amongst a well-studied cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perceptions of distress and positive consequences following exposure to a major disaster amongst a well-studied cohort
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, November 2014
DOI 10.1177/0004867414560652
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Research on the impact of natural disasters on health and well-being faces several methodological challenges, including: sampling issues; exposure assessment; and outcome measurement. The present study used a comprehensive measure of disaster exposure to assess relationships between exposure to the Canterbury (New Zealand) Earthquakes of 2010-2011 and both: (a) self-reported distress and (b) positive outcomes; and also investigated gender differences in reports.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 17 33%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 25%
Psychology 11 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 4 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2014.
All research outputs
#10,558,282
of 34,237,651 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#1,250
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,180
of 422,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,237,651 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.