↓ Skip to main content

Simple Radiometric Method for Accurately Quantitating Epitope Densities of Hapten–Protein Conjugates with Sulfhydryl Linkages

Overview of attention for article published in Bioconjugate Chemistry, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simple Radiometric Method for Accurately Quantitating Epitope Densities of Hapten–Protein Conjugates with Sulfhydryl Linkages
Published in
Bioconjugate Chemistry, November 2014
DOI 10.1021/bc500456z
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Control of small molecule hapten epitope densities on antigenic carrier proteins is essential for development and testing of optimal conditions for vaccines. Yet, accurate determination of epitope density can be extremely difficult to accomplish, especially with the use of small haptens, large molecular weight carrier proteins, and limited amounts of protein. Here we report a simple radiometric method that uses <sup>14</sup>C-labeled cystine to measure hapten epitope densities during sulfhydryl conjugation of haptens to maleimide activated carrier proteins. The method was developed using a (+)-methamphetamine (METH)-like hapten with a sulfhydryl terminus, and two prototype maleimide activated carrier proteins, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and immunocyanin monomers of keyhole limpet hemocyanin. The method was validated by immunochemical analysis of the hapten-BSA conjugates, and least-squares linear regression analysis of epitope density values determined by the new radiometric method versus values determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. Results showed radiometric epitope density values correlated extremely well with the mass spectrometry derived values (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.98, y=0.98x + 0.91). This convenient and simple method could be useful during several stages of vaccine development including the optimization and monitoring of conditions for hapten-protein conjugations, and choosing the most effective epitope densities for conjugate vaccines. <sup>

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 40%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2014.
All research outputs
#31,096,660
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Bioconjugate Chemistry
#5,514
of 5,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,664
of 423,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioconjugate Chemistry
#40
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.