↓ Skip to main content

Defective dendritic cell response to Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonists in perinatally HIV-infected children

Overview of attention for article published in Pathogens and Disease, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defective dendritic cell response to Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonists in perinatally HIV-infected children
Published in
Pathogens and Disease, August 2013
DOI 10.1111/2049-632x.12067
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Understanding the defects in innate immunity associated with perinatal HIV infection is a prerequisite for effective antiretroviral treatment. We therefore compared the innate immune response [dendritic cell (DC) phenotype and function] in peripheral blood by flow cytometry at baseline and 12 months in HIV-infected children to determine the defect associated with perinatal HIV infection. As compared with controls, patients had decreased numbers of total DCs including plasmacytoid (p)DCs and myeloid (m)DCs and impaired function based on induction of maturation markers (CD83, CD80, CCR7) and cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-α (exclusive to pDC) upon stimulation with the TLR7/8 agonist Resiquimod. These abnormalities were evident in all three CD4 immune categories and persisted over 12 months; pDC function worsened in HIV+ children without treatment and improved slightly in those on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In conclusion, a majority of perinatally HIV-infected older children without HAART remain clinically stable in the short term, but have demonstrable immunologic abnormalities indicative of defects in the innate immune system. Children initiated on HAART showed improvement in CD4 counts but did not show improvement in DC function over the short term.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2014.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Pathogens and Disease
#5
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,094
of 211,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathogens and Disease
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them