↓ Skip to main content

Bisphenol A and Reproductive Health: Update of Experimental and Human Evidence, 2007–2013

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health Perspectives, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bisphenol A and Reproductive Health: Update of Experimental and Human Evidence, 2007–2013
Published in
Environmental Health Perspectives, June 2014
DOI 10.1289/ehp.1307728
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In 2007, an expert panel reviewed associations between bisphenol A (BPA) exposure and reproductive health outcomes. Since then, new studies have been conducted on the impact of BPA on reproduction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 423 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 15%
Student > Master 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Researcher 42 10%
Student > Postgraduate 24 6%
Other 75 17%
Unknown 125 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 11%
Environmental Science 37 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 5%
Other 80 19%
Unknown 142 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2026.
All research outputs
#246,819
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health Perspectives
#277
of 10,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,654
of 275,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health Perspectives
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.