↓ Skip to main content

Early childhood caries and intake of 100 percent fruit juice Data from NHANES, 1999-2004

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Early childhood caries and intake of 100 percent fruit juice Data from NHANES, 1999-2004
Published in
Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), December 2014
DOI 10.14219/jada.2014.95
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The results of several studies conducted in the United States show no association between intake of 100 percent fruit juice and early childhood caries (ECC). The authors examined this association according to poverty and race/ethnicity among U.S. preschool children.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 31 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 33 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,204,386
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#341
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,976
of 422,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.