↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of our understanding of macrophages and translation of findings toward the clinic

Overview of attention for article published in Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The evolution of our understanding of macrophages and translation of findings toward the clinic
Published in
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology, December 2014
DOI 10.1586/1744666x.2015.985658
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

'There is at bottom only one genuinely scientific treatment for all diseases, and that is to stimulate the phagocytes,' so declaimed Sir Ralph Bloomfield Bonington in The Doctor's Dilemma, Act 1, by George Bernard Shaw (1906). More often nowadays, the need is to calm the phagocytes, given their role in inflammation and tissue damage. In spite of the growth of cellular and molecular information gained from studies in macrophage cell culture, mouse models and, to a lesser extent, human investigations, and the importance of macrophages in pathogenesis in a wide range of chronic disease processes, there is still a substantial shortfall in terms of clinical applications. In this review, we summarize concepts derived from macrophage studies and suggest possible properties suitable for diagnosis, prognosis and selective targeting of macrophage pathogenic functions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
United Kingdom 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 9%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%