| Title |
Homo erectus at Trinil on Java used shells for tool production and engraving
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13962 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josephine C. A. Joordens, Francesco d’Errico, Frank P. Wesselingh, Stephen Munro, John de Vos, Jakob Wallinga, Christina Ankjærgaard, Tony Reimann, Jan R. Wijbrans, Klaudia F. Kuiper, Herman J. Mücher, Hélène Coqueugniot, Vincent Prié, Ineke Joosten, Bertil van Os, Anne S. Schulp, Michel Panuel, Victoria van der Haas, Wim Lustenhouwer, John J. G. Reijmer, Wil Roebroeks |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 257 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 24 | 9% |
| Spain | 16 | 6% |
| France | 14 | 5% |
| Australia | 9 | 4% |
| Germany | 8 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 3% |
| Sweden | 6 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 95 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 211 | 82% |
| Scientists | 36 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 424 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 81 | 18% |
| Researcher | 66 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 10% |
| Professor | 38 | 8% |
| Other | 75 | 17% |
| Unknown | 97 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 93 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 12% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 8% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 119 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2026.
All research outputs
#16,908
of 34,804,214 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,473
of 118,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87
of 426,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#11
of 960 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,804,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 95.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 960 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.