You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating restorable wetland water storage at landscape scales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hydrological Processes, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hyp.11405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles Nathan Jones, Grey R. Evenson, Daniel L. McLaughlin, Melanie K. Vanderhoof, Megan W. Lang, Greg W. McCarty, Heather E. Golden, Charles R. Lane, Laurie C. Alexander |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 54% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 97 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 16% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,346,554
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Hydrological Processes
#277
of 2,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,596
of 446,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrological Processes
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.