↓ Skip to main content

Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Extracurricular activities and the development of social skills in children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, November 2014
DOI 10.1111/jir.12171
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Children with intellectual disability and specific learning disabilities often lack age-appropriate social skills, which disrupts their social functioning. Because of the limited effectiveness of classroom mainstreaming and social skills training for these children, it is important to explore alternative opportunities for social skill acquisition. Participation in social activities is positively related to children's social adjustment, but little is known about the benefits of activity participation for children with intellectual and specific learning disabilities.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 66 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 33 19%
Psychology 30 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Arts and Humanities 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 68 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,691,440
of 28,978,034 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#1,191
of 1,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,988
of 380,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,978,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.