↓ Skip to main content

The implications of fellowship expansion on future pediatric urologist surgical volumes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pediatric Urology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The implications of fellowship expansion on future pediatric urologist surgical volumes
Published in
Journal of Pediatric Urology, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.10.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Over the past 25 years, Pediatric Urology fellowship programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) have more than doubled. This increase may lead to a significant decrease in the number of operative cases per surgeon and therefore impact the current practice of pediatric urology. The objective in conducting this study is to try and predict the effect of the current number of pediatric urology fellowship training positions on future case volume per surgeon using a mathematical model and to discuss future management of the pediatric urology workforce. The current study employed a mathematical model to predict the effect of the number of fellowship graduates on future "case volume per surgeon". We incorporated population growth rates, to calculate incidence rates of key procedures/conditions and the anticipated retirement rate of the current pool of pediatric urologists to help calculate this. There is a possibility to increase the number of practicing board-certified pediatric urologists in the next 30 years from approximately 325 to 900 (figure). There will be a twofold reduction in case volume per surgeon compared to the present in model 1. In model 2 the decrease in case volumes is less significant. The annual number of fellows needed to obtain a future-to-current ratio equal to 1 is 16 for model 1, and 26 for model 2. Our study demonstrates, by using two different models that the current number of pediatric urology fellowship training positions in the United States will ultimately lead to a significant decrease in the case volume per surgeons. Our model has limitations as it relies on multiple assumptions. We are assuming that all fellowship positions would be filled every year and that all fellows would graduate, establish their practices in the United States, and devote 100% of their assumed 30-year professional career to pediatric urology. We also made assumptions of disease occurrence and need for surgical correction. The final assumption we made was that the birth rate would stay static over the next 30 years even though it has been declining for many decades. This exercise, even with its inherent limitations, is still sufficient to demonstrate that fellowship expansion warrants thoughtful discussion.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 19%
Professor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Sports and Recreations 2 13%
Linguistics 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,679,380
of 31,266,886 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Urology
#81
of 2,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,639
of 469,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Urology
#2
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,266,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,910 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.