↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Crown/Implant Ratio on Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Periodontology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Influence of Crown/Implant Ratio on Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Periodontology, September 2014
DOI 10.1902/jop.2014.130615
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

With the increased use of short dental implants (<10 mm), a high crown/implant (C/I) ratio has become a common finding. However, the effect of the C/I ratio on the marginal bone loss (MBL) has not yet been examined extensively. Hence, the aim of the present systematic review is to explore the influence of the C/I ratio on the success rate and MBL of dental implants.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 18%
Student > Postgraduate 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 63 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 145 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Engineering 3 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 75 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,881,557
of 27,380,387 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Periodontology
#1,766
of 2,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,008
of 251,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Periodontology
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,380,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.