↓ Skip to main content

The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in small animal veterinary medicine: A comparison with current approaches in human medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary & Comparative Oncology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in small animal veterinary medicine: A comparison with current approaches in human medicine
Published in
Veterinary & Comparative Oncology, November 2017
DOI 10.1111/vco.12372
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The relevance of regional lymph node (LN) assessment to quantify the metastatic spread of cancer is well recognized in veterinary oncology. Evaluation of LNs is critical for tumour staging. However, sampling the correct LN may not be possible without sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. Methods for diagnostic imaging and intraoperative detection of SLNs are well established in human medicine, in particular, the combination of lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative application of blue dyes. Nevertheless, alternative imaging techniques are available and have gained increasing interest. Successful implementation of these techniques in dogs have been reported in both clinical and experimental studies. This review aims to provide an overview of SLN mapping techniques in human and veterinary medicine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 12%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 67 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 79 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 68 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#22,421,584
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary & Comparative Oncology
#398
of 1,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,090
of 494,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary & Comparative Oncology
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.