↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study of systemic influences on paramedic decision making: care transitions and patient safety

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A qualitative study of systemic influences on paramedic decision making: care transitions and patient safety
Published in
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, December 2014
DOI 10.1177/1355819614558472
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Paramedics routinely make critical decisions about the most appropriate care to deliver in a complex system characterized by significant variation in patient case-mix, care pathways and linked service providers. There has been little research carried out in the ambulance service to identify areas of risk associated with decisions about patient care. The aim of this study was to explore systemic influences on decision making by paramedics relating to care transitions to identify potential risk factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 392 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 18%
Student > Master 51 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 7%
Researcher 26 7%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Other 59 15%
Unknown 138 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 121 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 20%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 2%
Psychology 9 2%
Other 25 6%
Unknown 137 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,391,940
of 34,562,876 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#89
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,536
of 423,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,562,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.