↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of self-reported sleep parameters compared with actigraphy in young people with mental ill-health

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep Health, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accuracy of self-reported sleep parameters compared with actigraphy in young people with mental ill-health
Published in
Sleep Health, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.sleh.2015.07.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Validation of self-report assessment of habitual sleep duration and onset time in young people with mental ill-health. Validation sample. Specialized early intervention centers for young people in Sydney, Australia. One hundred and forty-six young people with mental ill-health. N/A. Self-reported habitual sleep duration and onset time were compared against at least 7 days of actigraphy monitoring. Average bias in and calibration of subjective measures were assessed, along with correlation of subjective and objective measures. Differences by age, sex, mental-disorder type, and reported insomnia were also explored. On average, subjective estimates of sleep were unbiased. Overall, each additional hour of objective habitual sleep duration predicted 41 minutes more subjective habitual sleep duration, and each hour later objective habitual sleep onset occurred predicted a 43-minute later subjective habitual sleep onset. There were subgroup differences: subjective habitual sleep duration in self-reported insomnia was shorter than objective duration by 30 minutes (SD = 119), on average. Calibration of habitual sleep duration was worse for those with mood disorders than with other primary diagnoses (t = -2.39, P = .018). Correlation between subjective and objective measures was strong for sleep onset time (Á = .667, P < .001) and moderate for sleep duration (r = .332, P < .001). For the mood disorder group, subjective and objective sleep durations were uncorrelated. Self-reports seem valid for large-scale studies of habitual sleep duration and onset in help-seeking young people, but assessment of habitual sleep duration requires objective measures where individual accuracy is important.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 27 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 31 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2022.
All research outputs
#11,518,249
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Sleep Health
#523
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,347
of 299,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep Health
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.