↓ Skip to main content

Rise of the zombie institution, the failure of mental health nursing leadership, and mental health nursing as a zombie category

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
54 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rise of the zombie institution, the failure of mental health nursing leadership, and mental health nursing as a zombie category
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, November 2017
DOI 10.1111/inm.12408
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In this paper, we propose that mental health nursing has become a zombie category, at least in the Australian context. Mental health nursing is a concept that has lost any real explanatory or conceptual power, yet nevertheless persists in public discourse and the collective imagination. In recent decades, powerful forces have contributed to the zombification of the mental health nursing workforce and the academy. An increase in medical hegemony, the ascendancy of allied health in mental health service provision, the need for uncritical and servile workers, protocol-driven work practices, and a failure of leadership to mobilize any substantial resistance to these trends have enabled the infection to spread. The recognition of zombification, active resistance against the forces that conspire to cause it, and the cultivation of genuine conscientious critical thought and debate offer the only hope of survival of mental health nursing as a thriving specialty.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 31%
Psychology 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,180,093
of 29,820,216 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#71
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,459
of 458,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,820,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.