Wnt proteins regulate diverse biological responses by initiating two general outcomes: β-catenin-dependent transcription and β-catenin-independent activation of signaling cascades, the latter including modulation of calcium and regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics (Planar Cell Polarity, PCP). It has been difficult to elucidate the mechanisms by which Wnt signals are directed to effect one or the other outcome due to shared signaling proteins between the β-catenin-dependent and -independent pathways, such as the Dishevelled binding protein Naked. While all Naked paralogs contain a putative calcium-binding domain, the EF-Hand, Drosophila Naked does not bind calcium. Here we find a lineage-specific evolutionary change within the Drosophila Naked EF-hand that is not shared with other insects or vertebrates. We demonstrate the necessary role of the EF-hand for Nkd localization changes in calcium fluxing cells and using in vivo assays, we identify a role for the zebrafish Naked EF-hand in PCP but not in β-catenin antagonism. In contrast, Drosophila-like Nkd does not function in PCP, but is a robust antagonist of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. This work reveals that the zebrafish Nkd1 EF-hand is essential to balance Wnt signaling inputs and modulate the appropriate outputs, while the Drosophila-like EF-Hand primarily functions in β-catenin signaling.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Biology
#5,298
of 5,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385,237
of 446,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Biology
#56
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,559 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
