↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
No Association Between Left-Breast Radiation Therapy or Breast Arterial Calcification and Long-Term Cardiac Events in Patients with Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Women's Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1089/jwh.2014.4748
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Abstract Background: Recent studies have suggested an association between radiation therapy (RT) of the left breast and increased incidence of coronary artery disease. However, the increased sparing afforded with modern RT may decrease long-term cardiac risk. The aims of our study were to evaluate the association between the RT and cardiac events in breast cancer patients who underwent contemporary RT and to examine whether breast arterial calcification (BAC) seen on mammogram predicts for cardiac events. Methods and Materials: In our observational, descriptive pilot study, 2,439 patients with breast cancer between 1986 and 2007 and a minimum of 3 years since completing RT were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding cardiac events since RT completion. The preoperative and follow-up mammograms were coded for presence/absence of BAC by an experienced radiologist blinded to questionnaire results. Cardiac events were compared between patients who received left- and right-sided adjuvant radiation. Results: At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range 3-24), 687 patients completed the questionnaire, with 602 eligible for analysis. Baseline characteristics (age, body mass index [BMI], surgery type, cardiovascular risk factors, and time since RT) were similar in patients who received left- versus right-sided RT. Hypertension before RT and during follow-up, baseline cardiovascular disease, age >50, BMI >30 kg/m(2), and subsequent development of diabetes were significantly associated with posttreatment cardiac events. BACs were associated with cardiac events reported before breast cancer diagnosis; however, no association was found between left-sided breast RT or BAC and subsequent cardiac events. Conclusion: In a large single-institutional observational study, no association was found between left-sided breast RT or BAC and subsequent cardiac events.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Researcher 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,751,515
of 26,875,495 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Women's Health
#995
of 2,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,534
of 373,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Women's Health
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,875,495 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.