↓ Skip to main content

A General Strategy for Development of Near‐Infrared Fluorescent Probes for Bioimaging

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A General Strategy for Development of Near‐Infrared Fluorescent Probes for Bioimaging
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/anie.201710688
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent dyes with favorable photophysical properties are highly useful for bioimaging, but such dyes are still rare. Here, we describe the development of a unique class of NIR dyes via modifying the rhodol-scaffold with fused tetrahydroquinoxaline rings. These new dyes showed large Stokes shifts (>110 nm). Among them, WR3, WR4, WR5 and WR6 displayed high fluorescence quantum yields and excellent photostability in aqueous solutions. Moreover, their fluorescence properties were tunable by easy modifications on the phenolic hydroxyl group. Based on WR6, two NIR fluorescent turn-on probes, WSP-NIR and SeSP-NIR, were devised for the detection of H2S. The probe SeSP-NIR was applied in visualizing intracellular H2S. The dyes presented herein are expected to be useful fluorophore scaffolds in the development of new NIR probes for bioimaging.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 30 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 25 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2024.
All research outputs
#849,658
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#712
of 61,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,505
of 492,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#18
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.