↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does Cost-Related Medication Nonadherence among Cardiovascular Disease Patients Vary by Gender? Evidence from a Nationally Representative Sample
Published in
Women's Health Issues, November 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.whi.2016.10.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death and disability as well as a major burden on the U.S. healthcare system. Cost-related medication nonadherence (CRN) to prescribed medications is common among patients with CVD. This study examines the gender differences in CRN among CVD patients. We used 2011 to 2014 data from the National Health Interview Survey, an annual, cross-sectional, nationally representative household survey of the noninstitutionalized U.S. civilian population (≥18 years of age). Based on Andersen's model of health services utilization, multivariate logistic regressions were estimated to examine the effect of gender on the primary composite outcome of CRN which was identified if any of the following types of CRN were reported: 1) skipped medication doses to save money, 2) took less medication to save money, and 3) delayed prescription filling to save money. Among CVD patients who had used a prescription medication in the last 12 months, 10.0% skipped medication doses, 10.6% took less medication, and 12.8% delayed filling their prescriptions. After adjusting for confounding factors, gender was found to be significantly associated with the composite outcome of CRN among CVD patients. Women were 1.54 times (95% confidence interval, 1.33-1.77) more likely to have any of the types of CRN compared with men. There are significant gender disparities in CRN among CVD patients. More support for and closer monitoring of CRN is needed for disadvantaged groups, especially women with limited resources.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,155,006
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Women's Health Issues
#422
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,142
of 450,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women's Health Issues
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.