↓ Skip to main content

Gene-environment interaction and psychiatric disorders: Review and future directions

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gene-environment interaction and psychiatric disorders: Review and future directions
Published in
Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.10.016
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Empirical studies suggest that psychiatric disorders result from a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors. Most evidence for such gene-environment interaction (GxE) is based on single candidate gene studies conducted from a Diathesis-Stress perspective. Recognizing the short-comings of candidate gene studies, GxE research has begun to focus on genome-wide and polygenic approaches as well as drawing on different theoretical concepts underlying GxE, such as Differential Susceptibility. After reviewing evidence from candidate GxE studies and presenting alternative theoretical frameworks underpinning GxE research, more recent approaches and findings from whole genome approaches are presented. Finally, we suggest how future GxE studies may unpick the complex interplay between genes and environments in psychiatric disorders.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 14%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Master 32 11%
Researcher 21 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 110 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 8%
Neuroscience 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 7%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 125 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2024.
All research outputs
#3,378,332
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
#206
of 2,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,378
of 367,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.