You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How much is new information worth? Evaluating the financial benefit of resolving management uncertainty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12373 |
| Authors |
Sean L. Maxwell, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Michael C. Runge, Hugh P. Possingham, Chooi Fei Ng, Eve McDonald‐Madden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 21% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 175 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 61 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,666,550
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,535
of 4,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,420
of 370,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.