↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative PCR in Epidemiology for Early Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis Cases in India

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantitative PCR in Epidemiology for Early Detection of Visceral Leishmaniasis Cases in India
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003366
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Studies employing serological, DTH or conventional PCR techniques suggest a vast proportion of Leishmania infected individuals living in regions endemic for Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) remain asymptomatic. This study was designed to assess whether quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be used for detection of asymptomatic or early Leishmania donovani infection and as a predictor of progression to symptomatic disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#19,156,659
of 27,778,980 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#7,631
of 10,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,553
of 376,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#122
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,778,980 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.