↓ Skip to main content

Profiling T Cell Activation Using Single-Molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Flow Cytometry

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
4 patents

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Profiling T Cell Activation Using Single-Molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Flow Cytometry
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, January 2015
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1401515
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Flow cytometric characterization of Ag-specific T cells typically relies on detection of protein analytes. Shifting the analysis to detection of RNA would provide several significant advantages, which we illustrate by developing a new host immunity-based platform for detection of infections. Cytokine mRNAs synthesized in response to ex vivo stimulation with pathogen-specific Ags are detected in T cells with single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization followed by flow cytometry. Background from pre-existing in vivo analytes is lower for RNAs than for proteins, allowing greater sensitivity for detection of low-frequency cells. Moreover, mRNA analysis reveals kinetic differences in cytokine expression that are not apparent at the protein level but provide novel insights into gene expression programs expected to define different T cell subsets. The utility of probing immunological memory of infections is demonstrated by detecting T cells that recognize mycobacterial and viral Ags in donors exposed to the respective pathogens.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#4,383,792
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#3,947
of 35,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,054
of 432,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#34
of 264 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 264 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.