↓ Skip to main content

Good Death Scale(GDS)日本語版訳の作成と言語的妥当性の検討

Overview of attention for article published in Palliative Care Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Good Death Scale(GDS)日本語版訳の作成と言語的妥当性の検討
Published in
Palliative Care Research, January 2017
DOI 10.2512/jspm.12.311
Authors

児玉 麻衣子, 小林 美貴, 片山 寛次, 田辺 公一, 森田 達也

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,936,449
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Palliative Care Research
#178
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,537
of 423,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Palliative Care Research
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.