↓ Skip to main content

Activation of GPCRs modulates quantal size in chromaffin cells through Gβγ and PKC

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Activation of GPCRs modulates quantal size in chromaffin cells through Gβγ and PKC
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, August 2005
DOI 10.1038/nn1529
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Exocytosis proceeds by either full fusion or 'kiss-and-run' between vesicle and plasma membrane. Switching between these two modes permits the cell to regulate the kinetics and amount of secretion. Here we show that ATP receptor activation reduces secretion downstream from cytosolic Ca2+ elevation in rat adrenal chromaffin cells. This reduction is mediated by activation of a pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o) protein, leading to activation of G(betagamma) subunits, which promote the 'kiss-and-run' mode by reducing the total open time of the fusion pore during a vesicle fusion event. Furthermore, parallel activation of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor removes the inhibitory effects of ATP on secretion. This is mediated by a G(q) pathway through protein kinase C activation. The inhibitory effects of ATP and its reversal by protein kinase C activation are also shared by opioids and somatostatin. Thus, a variety of G protein pathways exist to modulate Ca2+-evoked secretion at specific steps in fusion pore formation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 9 16%
Professor 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 44%
Neuroscience 8 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Chemistry 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2014.
All research outputs
#10,413,008
of 30,990,086 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#4,725
of 6,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,217
of 86,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#33
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,990,086 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.