↓ Skip to main content

Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury

Overview of attention for article published in Spinal Cord, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury
Published in
Spinal Cord, December 2014
DOI 10.1038/sc.2014.232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 140 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Neuroscience 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,690,556
of 27,014,701 outputs
Outputs from Spinal Cord
#220
of 2,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,505
of 366,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spinal Cord
#12
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,014,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.