↓ Skip to main content

Consequences of Making Weight: A Review of Eating Disorder Symptoms and Diagnoses in the United States Military

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 616)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Consequences of Making Weight: A Review of Eating Disorder Symptoms and Diagnoses in the United States Military
Published in
Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, December 2014
DOI 10.1111/cpsp.12082
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Eating disorders are serious psychiatric illnesses associated with health problems. Such problems may compromise military performance, highlighting the need to establish the level of eating pathology that exists in military samples. This article qualitatively reviews prevalence estimates of eating disorder symptoms and diagnoses in military samples, providing nonmilitary estimates for context. Findings suggest that eating disorder symptoms are prevalent in cadets and active duty service members, especially when using self-report measures. The increased salience of weight in the military and increased exposure to trauma may influence risk for eating disorders. Alternatively, individuals at risk for eating disorders may self-select into the military. Overall, this review suggests that eating disorder symptoms are common in military samples and that further research is warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 22 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 20%
Sports and Recreations 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 30 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2023.
All research outputs
#346,126
of 33,934,236 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice
#13
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,256
of 422,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,934,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them