↓ Skip to main content

What About the Girls? Sex-Based Differences in Autistic Traits and Adaptive Skills

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 6,217)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
72 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
60 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
634 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What About the Girls? Sex-Based Differences in Autistic Traits and Adaptive Skills
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-017-3413-9
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is growing evidence of a camouflaging effect among females with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), particularly among those without intellectual disability, which may affect performance on gold-standard diagnostic measures. This study utilized an age- and IQ-matched sample of school-aged youth (n = 228) diagnosed with ASD to assess sex differences on the ADOS and ADI-R, parent-reported autistic traits, and adaptive skills. Although females and males were rated similarly on gold-standard diagnostic measures overall, females with higher IQs were less likely to meet criteria on the ADI-R. Females were also found to be significantly more impaired on parent reported autistic traits and adaptive skills. Overall, the findings suggest that some autistic females may be missed by current diagnostic procedures.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 634 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 634 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 71 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 8%
Student > Master 53 8%
Researcher 37 6%
Other 80 13%
Unknown 279 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 160 25%
Social Sciences 31 5%
Neuroscience 31 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 3%
Other 67 11%
Unknown 301 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2025.
All research outputs
#137,071
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#31
of 6,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,473
of 492,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.