↓ Skip to main content

Tools for Assessing Outcomes in Studies of Chronic Cough CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

Overview of attention for article published in CHEST, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tools for Assessing Outcomes in Studies of Chronic Cough CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
Published in
CHEST, March 2015
DOI 10.1378/chest.14-2506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 15%
Researcher 21 15%
Other 19 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 41 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,390,007
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#4,487
of 18,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,180
of 297,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#49
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.