↓ Skip to main content

Associations of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms with Fracture Incidence

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Associations of Menopausal Vasomotor Symptoms with Fracture Incidence
Published in
JCEM, December 2014
DOI 10.1210/jc.2014-3062
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Context: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are common. Whether VMS are associated with fracture incidence or bone mineral density (BMD) levels is unknown. Objective: This study aimed to examine associations of baseline VMS with fracture incidence and BMD. Design: This was a prospective observational study with mean (SD) followup of 8.2 (1.7) years (1993-2005). Setting: Forty United States clinical centers. Participants: We examined data from Women's Health Initiative Clinical Trial participants (n = 23 573) age 50-79 years not using menopausal hormone therapy, and 4,867 participants of the BMD sub-study. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: We measured baseline VMS, incident adjudicated fractures, and BMD (baseline, annual visits 1, 3, 6, and 9). Results: After adjustment for baseline age, body mass index, race/ethnicity, smoking, and education, the hazard ratio for hip fracture among women with baseline moderate/severe VMS (vs no VMS) was 1.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-2.64; P = .01). There was no association between VMS and vertebral fracture. VMS severity was inversely associated with BMD during followup (P = .004 for femoral neck, P = .045 for lumbar spine). In repeated measures models, compared with women who reported no VMS, women with moderate/severe VMS had 0.015 g/cm(2) lower femoral neck BMD (95% CI, -0.025--0.005) and 0.016 g/cm(2) lower lumbar spine BMD (95% CI, -0.032--0.004). Conclusions: Women with moderate/severe VMS have lower BMD and increased hip fracture rates. Elucidation of the biological mechanisms underlying these associations may inform the design of preventive strategies for at-risk women prior to occurrence of fracture.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Professor 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 27 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 32 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2025.
All research outputs
#462,641
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#429
of 21,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,455
of 411,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#8
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.