RP @profsimonfisher.bsky.social: A closer look reveals that earlobe attachment doesn’t fall neatly into two types, but encompasses much variation. As early as 1937 some argued it may be polygenic: shaped by variants of many genes. The rise of genome scans…
RP @profsimonfisher.bsky.social: A closer look reveals that earlobe attachment doesn’t fall neatly into two types, but encompasses much variation. As early as 1937 some argued it may be polygenic: shaped by variants of many genes. The rise of genome scans…
RP @profsimonfisher.bsky.social: A closer look reveals that earlobe attachment doesn’t fall neatly into two types, but encompasses much variation. As early as 1937 some argued it may be polygenic: shaped by variants of many genes. The rise of genome scans…
RP @profsimonfisher.bsky.social: A closer look reveals that earlobe attachment doesn’t fall neatly into two types, but encompasses much variation. As early as 1937 some argued it may be polygenic: shaped by variants of many genes. The rise of genome scans…