↓ Skip to main content

Leadership as an emergent group process: A social network study of personality and leadership

Overview of attention for article published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Leadership as an emergent group process: A social network study of personality and leadership
Published in
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, January 2013
DOI 10.1177/1368430212461835
Authors

Cécile Emery, Thomas S. Calvard, Meghan E. Pierce

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 275 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 18%
Student > Master 46 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Researcher 11 4%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 65 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 67 24%
Social Sciences 30 11%
Engineering 7 3%
Arts and Humanities 7 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 69 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2015.
All research outputs
#13,724,165
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#552
of 797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,237
of 282,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.