↓ Skip to main content

Generalized Periodic Discharges With and Without Triphasic Morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of clinical neurophysiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Generalized Periodic Discharges With and Without Triphasic Morphology
Published in
Journal of clinical neurophysiology, March 2018
DOI 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000441
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) with a triphasic morphology have been associated with nonepileptic encephalopathies. We conducted the study to assess the reliability in which electroencephalographers can differentiate triphasic from nontriphasic periodic discharges and to evaluate for the presence of electroencephalogram and clinical characteristics that are associated with a higher risk of seizures. We studied prospectively 92 patients between May 2016 and February 2017. Each pattern was analyzed by two readers, who were blinded to clinical data. The interrater agreement was "substantial" (Kappa 0.67). The following features significantly increased the risk of developing seizures: the absence of triphasic morphology, focality on electroencephalogram, interburst suppression, a history of epilepsy, and an abnormal scan. The "GPD score" includes a history of epilepsy, focality on electroencephalogram, and the absence of triphasic morphology. A GPD score of 0 has 13% risk of seizures, whereas a score of 5 to 6 has a 94% risk. Triphasic morphology GPDs confer less risk of seizures when compared with patients with GPDs without triphasic morphology. Features with a higher risk of seizures include focality on electroencephalogram, interburst suppression, a history of epilepsy, and an abnormal scan. The GPD score can be used to assess the risk of developing seizures in patients with GPDs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Neuroscience 7 19%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#27,764,246
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of clinical neurophysiology
#986
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#289,299
of 373,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of clinical neurophysiology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.