↓ Skip to main content

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy activates hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 (HIF‐1), which contributes to improved wound healing in diabetic mice

Overview of attention for article published in Wound Repair & Regeneration, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy activates hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 (HIF‐1), which contributes to improved wound healing in diabetic mice
Published in
Wound Repair & Regeneration, February 2015
DOI 10.1111/wrr.12253
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy has been used as an adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot ulcers, although its mechanism of action is not completely understood. Recently, it has been shown that HBO mobilizes the endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) from bone marrow that eventually will aggregate in the wound. However, the gathering of the EPCs in diabetic wounds is impaired due to the decreased levels of local stromal-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α). Therefore, we investigated the influence of HBO on HIF-1, which is a central regulator of SDF-1α and is down-regulated in diabetic wounds. The effects of HBO on HIF-1α function were studied in human dermal fibroblasts, SKRC7 cells and HIF-1α knock-out and wild-type mouse embryonic fibroblasts using appropriate techniques (Western blot, Quantitative-PCR and Luciferase hypoxia-responsive element (HRE) reporter assay). Cellular proliferation was assessed using H(3) -thymidine incorporation assay. The effect of HIF in combination with HBOT was tested by inoculating stable HIF-1α-expressing adenovirus (Adv-HIF) into experimental wounds in db/db mice exposed to HBO. HBO activates HIF-1α at several levels by increasing both HIF-1α stability (by a non-canonical mechanism) and activity (as show both by induction of relevant target-genes and by a specific reporter assay). HIF-1α induction has important biological relevance because the induction of fibroblast proliferation in HBO disappears when HIF-1α is knocked down. Moreover, the local transfer of stable HIF-1α-expressing adenovirus (Adv-HIF) into experimental wounds in diabetic (db/db mice) has an additive effect on HBO-mediated improvements in wound healing. In conclusion HBO stabilizes and activates HIF-1, which contributes to increased cellular proliferation. In diabetic animals, the local transfer of active HIF further improves the effects of HBO on wound healing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 54 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 62 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2024.
All research outputs
#23,107,508
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from Wound Repair & Regeneration
#1,033
of 1,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,857
of 418,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wound Repair & Regeneration
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.