↓ Skip to main content

Impact of the synthesis method on the solid-state charge transport of radical polymers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of the synthesis method on the solid-state charge transport of radical polymers
Published in
Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices, January 2018
DOI 10.1039/c7tc04645f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There are conflicting reports in the literature about the presence of room temperature conductivity in poly(2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinyloxy methacrylate) (PTMA), a redox active polymer with radical groups pendent to an insulating backbone. To understand the variability in the findings across the literature and synthetic methods, we prepared PTMA using three living methods - anionic, ATRP and RAFT polymerization. We find that all three synthetic methods produce PTMA with radical yields of 70 - 80%, controlled molecular weight, and low dispersity. Additionally, we used on-chip EPR to probe the robustness of radical content in solid films under ambient air and light, and found negligible change in the radical content over time. Electrically, we found that PTMA is highly insulating - conductivity in the range 10-11 S/cm - regardless of the synthetic method of preparation. These findings provide greater clarity for potential applications of PTMA in energy storage.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 31%
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 31%
Materials Science 10 20%
Physics and Astronomy 4 8%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices
#8,641
of 12,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#442,007
of 496,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Chemistry C: Materials for optical and electronic devices
#582
of 1,413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.