↓ Skip to main content

The effect of external ankle support on the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during a side step cutting task in netballers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of external ankle support on the kinematics and kinetics of the lower limb during a side step cutting task in netballers
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/2052-1847-6-42
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Excessive knee valgus moments are considered to be a risk factor for non-contact injuries in female athletes. Knee injuries are highly prevalent in netballers and are significant in terms of cost and disability. The aim of the study was to identify if changes in external ankle support mechanisms effect the range of motion and loading patterns at the ankle and knee joint during a sidestep cutting manoeuvre in high performance netball players.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 25%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 8 5%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 52 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 38 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Psychology 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 61 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,508,102
of 32,051,844 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#177
of 876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,874
of 394,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,051,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.