You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
時効硬化Al合金における特異な疲労破壊とその巨視的および微視的様相
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese), January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1299/transjsme.17-00273 |
| Authors |
皮籠石 紀雄, 中村 祐三, 仮屋 孝二, 永野 茂憲, 岩本 竜一 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2017.
All research outputs
#19,820,130
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,779
of 428,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the JSME (in Japanese)
#39
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.