↓ Skip to main content

p53 is required for both radiation-induced differentiation and rescue of V(D)J rearrangement in scid mouse thymocytes.

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Development, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
p53 is required for both radiation-induced differentiation and rescue of V(D)J rearrangement in scid mouse thymocytes.
Published in
Genes & Development, March 1996
DOI 10.1101/gad.10.5.553
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The murine scid mutation affects both V(D)J recombination and DNA repair. This mutation has been mapped to the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which is activated by DNA damage in normal cells. In scid mice, antigen receptor gene rearrangements are initiated normally, but impaired joining of coding ends prevents assembly of functional receptor genes, resulting in arrest of B- and T-cell development. Others have shown that exposure of scid mice to genotoxic agents such as gamma-irradiation rescues rearrangement at the T-cell receptor (TCR) beta locus and promotes thymocyte development. Here we demonstrate that irradiation rescues rearrangements at multiple TCR loci, suggesting a general effect on the recombination mechanism. Furthermore, our data show that p53 is required for irradiation-mediated rescue of both thymocyte development and V(D)J recombination. We also find that thymocyte proliferation and differentiation in the absence of DNA damage do not require p53 and are not sufficient to rescue V(D)J recombination. These results suggest that exposure to ionizing radiation facilitates a partial bypass of the scid defect, perhaps by inducing p53-dependent DNA damage response pathways.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 12%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2010.
All research outputs
#7,542,364
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Development
#3,152
of 5,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,262
of 26,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Development
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.