You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
非科学的知識の広がりと専門家の責任
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.5363/tits.22.8_18 |
| Authors |
田中 重人 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 28% |
| Unknown | 26 | 72% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 94% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,624,660
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#18
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,648
of 421,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TRENDS IN THE SCIENCES
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.