↓ Skip to main content

Employment Discrimination: The Role of Implicit Attitudes, Motivation, and a Climate for Racial Bias

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
14 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Employment Discrimination: The Role of Implicit Attitudes, Motivation, and a Climate for Racial Bias
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, May 2005
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.553
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study is an attempt to replicate and extend research on employment discrimination by A. P. Brief and colleagues (A. P. Brief, J. Dietz, R. R. Cohen, S. D. Pugh, & J. B. Vaslow, 2000). More specifically, the authors attempted (a) to constructively replicate the prior finding that an explicit measure of modern racism would interact with a corporate climate for racial bias to predict discrimination in a hiring context and (b) to extend this finding through the measurement of implicit racist attitudes and motivation to control prejudice. Although the authors were unable to replicate the earlier interaction, they did illustrate that implicit racist attitudes interacted with a climate for racial bias to predict discrimination. Further, results partially illustrate that motivation to control prejudice moderates the relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes. Taken together, the findings illustrate the differences between implicit and explicit racial attitudes in predicting discriminatory behavior.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 351 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 24%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 11%
Researcher 29 8%
Other 63 17%
Unknown 61 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 154 41%
Business, Management and Accounting 63 17%
Social Sciences 42 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 2%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 70 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2025.
All research outputs
#2,877,916
of 33,077,492 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#834
of 3,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,607
of 95,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,077,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.